The Problem With Conviction

Why confidence is easy to manufacture, but calibrated conviction is extraordinarily difficult to fake.

One of the most common pieces of fundraising advice in venture capital is that LPs back conviction. Managers are told they must project confidence, demonstrate unwavering belief in their strategy, and communicate a clear sense of certainty about the future they intend to build. Whether the advice comes from consultants, placement agents, other managers, or the broader venture ecosystem, the message is largely the same: conviction inspires trust, and trust attracts capital.

There is undoubtedly some truth to this observation. Few allocators are eager to commit capital to managers who appear confused about their strategy, uncertain about their decision-making process, or hesitant about the opportunity they are pursuing. A manager who lacks conviction can create doubt before a serious discussion has even begun.

Yet the more time I spend observing fundraising conversations, the more I suspect that the industry’s obsession with conviction has led many managers toward the wrong conclusion.

The problem is not that conviction lacks value.

The problem is that conviction itself is surprisingly cheap.

Every founder possesses conviction.

Every first-time fund manager possesses conviction.

Every emerging manager pursuing an unconventional thesis possesses conviction.

In fact, conviction is often a prerequisite for entering the arena in the first place. It is difficult to spend years building a company, launching a fund, or pursuing an uncertain opportunity without developing a strong belief that you are seeing something others do not.

What makes conviction a weak signal is precisely its abundance.

History provides countless examples of people who possessed extraordinary conviction while being completely wrong. Conviction has accompanied some of the greatest investment decisions ever made. It has also accompanied some of the worst. By itself, conviction tells us very little about the quality of a person’s thinking. It merely tells us that the person believes something strongly.

The more interesting question is how that belief was formed.

Most managers spend a great deal of time thinking about how to communicate conviction. Far fewer spend time examining where that conviction comes from, how it was developed, and whether it has been sufficiently tested by reality.

Yet that is often where the most important questions begin.

Continue reading below.